Supreme Court to Decide Whether Civil Contempt Requires Explicit Injunction Language
The Supreme Court granted review of Apple's contempt finding in the Epic Games case on a single narrow question: whether a court can hold a party in contempt for violating an injunction's spirit when the order does not explicitly prohibit the conduct at issue. The case does not reopen App Store antitrust merits, and the underlying injunction requiring Apple to permit external payment links remains in force while briefing proceeds through at least November 2026. The Court's answer could affect how broadly federal courts may enforce injunctions across all civil litigation, not just this dispute.